Comments on: Benchmark of Various Terminal Emulation Programs

By: Priyadi

Priyadi — Fri, 21 Jan 2005 03:31:21 +0000

Yes, same fonts, same hinting, same terminal size, etc. but I was too lazy to figure out how to do it on all of them.

By: Terminator

Terminator — Fri, 21 Jan 2005 00:40:56 +0000

for a fair comparison, you should set the terminals to use the same font!

By: budiap

budiap — Wed, 12 Jan 2005 16:29:07 +0000

AMD Athlon(tm) XP 1900+, sambil kompile glibc sama nonton pake mplayer:

KDE Konsole: 2m+
screen: 44.145s

kesimpulan, pakailah “screen” untuk compile2

By: Ronny

Ronny — Fri, 07 Jan 2005 10:37:21 +0000

Using PuTTY over 100 Mbps LAN I got 42.345 seconds. Heh. I think the network buffering has something to do with it. Somebody could try serial console with Tera Term or something similar, too, if they’d like.

By: Ananda Putra

Ananda Putra — Tue, 04 Jan 2005 19:52:00 +0000

Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.40GHz
Eterm
1st bench:
real 0m21.829s
user 0m2.900s
sys 0m1.580s

2nd:
real 0m19.409s
user 0m2.800s
sys 0m1.480s

3rd:
real 0m21.592s
user 0m2.700s
sys 0m1.370s

4th:
real 0m18.828s
user 0m2.780s
sys 0m1.800s

5th:
real 0m24.068s
user 0m2.570s
sys 0m1.860s

Kenapa ya beda2? *garuk2 kepala*

By: Jay

Jay — Tue, 04 Jan 2005 18:23:11 +0000

pake mesin PIII/733
* xterm (bitmap fonts): 5:10
* gnome-terminal (truetype fonts): 3:11
* rxvt (bitmap fonts): 1:01
* aterm (bitmap fonts): 0:34
* console framebuffer vesa-tng 1024×768: 10:09

*minder*

pindah ke aterm lagi ah…