Comments on: Fun With RFC2606 DNS Names

By: Anthony Fajri

Anthony Fajri — Fri, 08 Apr 2005 00:18:03 +0000

jadi inget, dulu ketika .cat belom di-resmikan, aku sempat make domain itu untuk catalyst. tapi setelah domain .cat diresmikan (tahun lalu?), jadi kagak bisa make itu lagi.

untung sekarang ada RFC tentang domain lokal.

By: Amal

Amal — Thu, 07 Apr 2005 06:49:19 +0000

In my opinion, using .dom TLD is better.

And also funny for my children: because dom means “stupid” in Dutch.

http://bapak.is.dom :d

By: priyadi

priyadi — Thu, 07 Apr 2005 04:50:27 +0000

#2: According to RFC2606, the best way is to use .example TLD, such as foo.example or bar.example. But ‘example’ is unusually long for a TLD. In my opinion, using .dom TLD is better. While not futureproof, it is short and sweet, it is not being used now, it looks like a real TLD and it rhymes with .com :).

By: Amal

Amal — Wed, 06 Apr 2005 20:59:30 +0000

I try to always use example.(com|org|net) for all examples in my articles, but sometimes I am worried with a condition: if I need two domains for example, it is not clear enough for common users (especially they who have no technical background) to distinguish between example.COM and example.NET. Seems two clear different domain name is in need.

By: iang

iang — Wed, 06 Apr 2005 11:08:38 +0000

di rumah gw pake .home :D