Comments on: Kesalahan Presisi

By: sabrina

sabrina — Tue, 02 Sep 2008 15:31:03 +0000

met kenal pak priyadi.

wah,saya tersesat.

tadi nyari di google ttg presisi,langsung kesini dah.

saya tau istilah “presisi” baru dari kuliah Kimia Analitik

doain ya pak.

By: Mbah Marijan

Mbah Marijan — Mon, 16 Apr 2007 02:26:21 +0000

#1 ngapusi, itu orang duplikat ku. Yo ben ra popo biar makin terkenal. Mas Pri, aku olih ilmu lagi. Ilmu itung2ngan. Ngitung jam, jarak, sampah, jumlah karyawan, berat badan, perjalanan Jakarta Bandung. Krn gurune Mas Pri, ilmune lain. Ora perlu meteran. Ana data, kalkulator, beres… iyo ra?

By: kakang suryana

kakang suryana — Tue, 03 Apr 2007 12:24:51 +0000

mas priiiiii mas priii dendam kusumat apa sama mas roy??? tapi ok kok comment nya

By: andhi

andhi — Sat, 17 Mar 2007 08:03:26 +0000

Ngomong opo tho ki?

By: weby

weby — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 19:52:06 +0000

# 132
Gartol tuh tuduhannya (gartol = garing tolol!) hahaha…

By: Miftah

Miftah — Fri, 09 Mar 2007 08:06:34 +0000

hehehe asli ngakak gw hehehehehehhe

By: orgindo

orgindo — Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:59:58 +0000

LOL, indo indo.
#116 zaman internet masih ada yang gitu2, free speech my friend. and btw, kenapa l peduli ama orang terkenal? terkenal = superior? if that is how you think, i suggest you to find some time machine and maybe go back 100 years before.

#132 Ini namanya iri, pak. Soalnya blog dia mungkin ga ada yang kunjungin. rasionalisasi.

Pak Pri, kok uda lama ga posting baru?

Peace

By: Priyadi

Priyadi — Thu, 08 Mar 2007 20:23:10 +0000

#132: tuduhan yang tidak berdasar bagian mana di tulisan saya yang nyebut2 orang tertentu? mungkin anda saja yang apatis.

#116: terkenal bukan berarti pasti benar

#110:

mas.. newspaper itu bukan scientific journal.
kecuali si abang nulis di kolom khusus sci.
so much time spent only to bang his
not-so-ridiculuous-mistake.
better spent elsewhere, where quality count.

this should be no brainer. i NEVER EVER said newspaper is scientific journal, they are of course free to say anything in non scientific terms. however, it is not ok to say something in the name of simplicity at the expense of correctness. the fact that something is being said in scientific or non scientific terms does not automatically determine its correctness.

anything being said in simple terms could be correct or not. in order to determine its correctness, it is sometimes necessary to explain the problem in scientific terms, like I just did. however, i think it should be obvious that it doesn’t mean I’m demanding everybody to use scientific terms, like you are implying.

am I getting too scientific to your taste again? and oh, please let me decide for myself on where quality counts.

By: Hell Me

Hell Me — Mon, 12 Feb 2007 08:30:42 +0000

namanya aja presisi versi indo artinya ya gak persis

By: seandainya

seandainya — Mon, 12 Feb 2007 02:33:30 +0000

seandainya semua orang harus memikirkan “presisi” dalam berujar.. mumet bo!

By: Remo Harsono

Remo Harsono — Sun, 11 Feb 2007 18:47:11 +0000

Kirain penting

By: Mbah Gambleh

Mbah Gambleh — Sat, 10 Feb 2007 08:43:55 +0000

Katanya ada seorang ahli multimedia yang membayar orang-orang agar terus mengkritik dia. Terus-menerus. Setiap saat. Meski dengan komentar berkonotasi cukup negatif sekalipun.

Dengan demikian ia (ahli multimedia) tetap disebut-sebut terus. Di tivi, di koran, di internet. Dengan demikian popularitasnya tetap terjaga.

Sepertinya ada beberapa orang bayaran itu yang menjalankan aksinya di blog ini.